Sunday 30 January 2022

It is Vital that We Defeat Tommy Robinson and his Hate-Filled Ideology.

 


It is a Saturday afternoon in late January and there is just enough sunlight to suggest that things might get warmer some time soon. In Southwater Square in the Shropshire town of Telford to protest against notorious racist rabble rouser Tommy Robison trying to use a rally in the town to relaunch his career, this time as an investigative journalist and filmmaker [1].

 

“We’re here to vent our anger,” an activist tells me both at Robinson and the Johnson government, which this week as its twists and turns over ‘partygate’ became even more convoluted seems finally have crossed the line into absurdity.

 

Activists have come from across the midlands and beyond to attend the event, something attested to by the banners and placards on display. These range from huge beautifully embroidered ones belonging to trades union branches held up on heavy wooden frames and will become increasingly hard to mange as the day gets windier, to simple placards made of cardboard and written out on the train on the way to Telford.

 

Robinson, real name Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon [2], is a right-wing activist linked at various stages of his political career with the BNP, the British Freedom Party and other, mostly now defunct, far right groups and was an adviser to former UKIP leader. His claim to fame, or notoriety anyway, is as the leader of the English Defence League from 2009 to 2013. His journalistic career has, to date been limited to writing for Canadian far right website Rebel News and appearing in ranting Facebook videos.

 

His criminal career has been more prolific, Robinson has racked up convictions for crimes including violence, stalking and immigration fraud. These have seen him jailed on numerous occasions, his most recent brush with the law in October last year saw him made subject of a five-year stalking order for harassing a journalist.

 

On the day of the rally Robinson is thought to have brought some 1500 supporter to Telford, newspaper photographs of them marching from the railway station show several giving Nazi salutes.

 

Arriving earlier in the day with a party of activists from Stoke-on-Trent I encountered a small number of his supporters along with the increased police presence mounted to curtail any potential flashpoints. They were, drawn straight from fascist central casting, older seedy looking men with short hair and tattoos drinking from cans and scowling at everyone they deemed to be different from their perceived norm.

 

Braver in crowds than alone most stayed silent or shouted muffled comments when they were a safe distance away. Later as the protest column approached where Robinson was holding his rally some more courageous of his supporters would periodically run up to us to shout abuse, usually holding up a mobile phone to record their ‘bravery’ for posterity. The overall impression was of deep anger without much in the way of intelligence to give it focus.

 

Robinson had been planning to hold his rally, at which he would be airing a film allegedly exposing links between the local Muslim community and child abuse, in the square where the counterdemonstration was assembling. This, one activist told me, had been quashed by councillors for the town and they had been relocated to a carpark by the station.

 

The abuse claims made against the Muslim community in Telford have not been proved and anti-racist group Hope Not Hate draw links between Robinson’s making them and a longer history of far-right groups using sexual allegations as a slur, citing as an example accusations of paedophilia made against the Jews in 1930’s Germany.

 

They also highlight the significant hypocrisy Robinson has shown in relation to paedophiles amongst his own supporters saying he has ‘an appalling record of confronting paedophilia and abuse within his own team and amongst his supporters. Lennon has consistently ignored or even defended occurrences of these crimes in his own ranks, proving that he is more concerned with attacking Muslims than actually combatting CSE or challenging sexual violence’ [3].

 

They point to the high number of active paedophiles identified as leading members of the EDL, including Brett Moses, given a suspended sentence for ‘child grooming’ in 2010, Leigh McMillan jailed for sexual offences going back to the 1990’s and, most sickeningly the convicted murderer Robert Ewing.

 

Hope Not Hate condemn sexual abuse in all its forms but point out that Robinson is using unfounded accusations to stir up division and promote a political ideology filled with prejudice and hatred. They write ‘Child sexual exploitation reaches across all communities, and these sickening actions involve men from all ethnic backgrounds. Lennon’s relentless exploitation of others’ pain is an insult to survivors and to those who work tirelessly to demand justice and build support services for survivors. His failure to condemn child sexual exploitation within his own ranks only highlights his hypocrisy as no ally of the pushback against CSE’.

 

This would be echoed in the speeches made on the day, Louise Regan, a national officer with the National Education Union said he was ‘scapegoating’ the Muslim community to further his political ambitions, adding that it was ‘absolutely crucial’ that people came together to oppose him. Wahid, a spokesperson for the Muslim community in Telford denounced Robinson as a ‘thug’ and a ‘racist’ who had repeatedly told lies, adding that as a father himself he ‘abhorred’ child abuse but refused to keep quiet when unfounded accusations are used to sow division.

 

Other speakers linked the rise of support for extremist views to a decade of austerity economics and the social divisions intensified by the pandemic. They called for working people to come together to oppose fascism and to fight for improved public services.

 

Robinson may have been forced to relocate his rally, this hadn’t deterred his supporters from traveling to Telford to hear him and an undercard of right wing ranters speak. This became apparent as we reached the carpark where it was being held, which had been fitted out with a stage of the sort seen at music festivals, a powerful PA system and a huge screen.

 

This, one activist told me, suggested that Robinson was being backed by ‘serious money’ from some source. A worrying prospect only slightly relieved when another activist pointed out to me, and with the aid of a bull horn to the star of the circus, that ‘he’s so stupid he can’t even fly the flag the right way up’.

 

It would be easy to see Tommy Robinson as a clown, the latest in a long line of far-right bogeymen who rise up, caper about the stage for a moment and then sink back into obscurity. There was little in his film, portions of which we were treated to from the far side of the road where we were corralled by the police, that suggests his latest re-invention as a journalist will be any more successful than any of his numerous other ones.

 

There are though things that should give pause for thought followed by some sleepless nights. Putting on an event the size of the one in Telford does require serious money, more certainly that the, allegedly, bankrupt Robinson could lay his hands on. The anger on which he thumps out an awkward tune like an ape trying to play the piano is very real and runs deeper in the community than just the usual suspects standing in the cold clutching their flags.

 

As an individual Tommy Robinson is a clownish figure, a strutting bully long on angry invective but forever short of much in the way of reason to back up his arguments. He might though serve as a useful, if noisy, place holder for a far right that can see a moment of opportunity approaching and just needs a leader with better social skills to make it appear acceptable to a public frustrated by the failings of mainstream politics.

 

That makes it even more important, something highlighted by all the speakers on the day, that all sections of the left come together to defeat not just Tommy Robinson, but the hate filled ideology for which the is, for the moment, the front man.

 

[1]https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/newsbirmingham/thousands-take-part-in-telford-protests-as-tommy-robinson-airs-documentary/ar-AAThab3

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Robinson_%28activist%29

[3]https://hopenothate.org.uk/2022/01/11/tommy-robinson-is-a-hypocrite-when-it-comes-to-opposing-child-sexual-exploitation/

 

Thursday 20 January 2022

Newcastle Council Assault on Green Space in Bradwell is ‘Disgraceful’ Say North Staffs Greens.

  


“The hypocrisy of the leader of a council that is trashing green spaces chairing a board promoting sustainability is nauseating".

 

“I’m devastated our council haven’t protected it’s people and the environment from the developers, I feel completely ignored by my concerns that have been swept under the carpet despite our legitimate concerns”.

 

This is what Bradwell resident Jessica Mellor wrote in a Facebook post responding to the news that Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council had granted developers Seddon Homes permission to build eighty-five houses on land to the north of Bradwell Hospital.

 

This will see one hundred and twenty trees felled to make way for the houses, last year residents formed Save Newcastle’s Green Sites to campaign to protect this and other threatened green spaces.

 

MS Mellor wrote to Peter Stepien, Landscaping Officer at the borough council, protesting on behalf of the group at the plans to fell trees on the Bradwell site.

 

His reply, as quoted in the Facebook post was: “I’m afraid planning permission has been granted for this development. This includes tree removal.”

 

A spokesperson for North Staffs Green Party said: “granting planning permission to build on this site and destroying 120 trees in the process represents a serious assault on a much-valued green space”.

 

Going on to add: “we fully support the efforts of residents in Bradwell and other communities to defend green spaces that are vital to their health and wellbeing and to preserving threatened nature”.

 

Describing her feelings about the loss to the trees and green space Jessica Mellor writes in her Facebook post: “I am looking to move home as I cannot stand and watch them tear down and destroy all those tree’s alongside killing any animals who utilise the land, I have seen foxes, squirrels, all sorts of birds there and they are losing their home and probably their lives. It genuinely gives me anxiety and I am tearful and helpless at this appalling decision.”


On the same day Jessica Mellor wrote her heartfelt Facebook post about the impact felling trees at Bradwell hospital will have on her wellbeing Simon Tagg, leader of the borough council and Councillor Joe Porter were named as Chair and Vice Chair of the newly formed Staffordshire Sustainability Board.

 

In a Twitter post Councillor Porter writes that ‘Across Staffordshire all our councils are working together in partnership to tackle climate change and recover nature’.

 

The spokesperson for North Staffs Green Party said: “the hypocrisy of the leader of a council that is trashing green spaces chairing a board promoting sustainability is nauseating. They are not working to recover nature and are doing nothing to tackle climate change”.

 

Save Newcastle’s Green Sites have produced a hard-hitting YouTube video highlighting the impact felling to trees at Bradwell will have and urging residents of Newcastle to respond to the public consultation on the council’s Strategic Options for green spaces.

 

It can be watched at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_sfv8DvoXo

 

They have also launched a petition of the Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council website, accessible at:

https://tinyurl.com/budtjc33

Tuesday 18 January 2022

Greens Call for Independent Investigation into Partygate.

 

Activists in North Staffordshire have given their backing to calls by the Green Party for ‘full, fair, and independent’ investigation into a garden party held at Downing Street on 20th May 2020 while the county was in lockdown.

 

A spokesperson said “ There is a serious breach of trust involved in the prime minister telling people to stay at home to save lives and protect the NHS and then breaking the rules by attending a garden party at Downing Street, claims that he believed this to be a ‘work event’ and risible and insulting to those who lost loved ones during the pandemic”.

 

Prime Minister Boris Johnson attended the party and when challenged about it claimed he believed it to have been a ‘work event’ and therefore not against the rules then in place.

 

This claim was reiterated in an apology he gave to the House of Commons last week. It has since been claimed by former adviser Dominic Cummings that the prime minister was warned that the party was in breach of lockdown rules.

 

Principal private secretary to Boris Johnson Martin Reynolds sent an email to one hundred staff members to ‘socially distanced drinks’ in the garden at Downing street to which they should ‘bring their own booze.’

 

When challenged about holding the party by Dominic Cummings and another member of the Downing Street staff Martin Reynolds declined to withdraw the invite. Cummings then took the issue up with the prime minister himself, who, he alleges, ‘waived aside’ his concerns [1].

 

In a pool interview reported by the BBC and other media outlets Boris Johnson again denied any knowledge that the party/work event was against the rules then in place and that he had misled parliament when he made his apology [2].

 

An investigation into what has been dubbed ‘partygate’ is being conducted by senior civil servant Sue Gray, her remit covers the garden party and other gatherings that took place at Downing Street during lockdowns in 2020 and 2021.

 

Launching their petition, the Green Party said, ‘While we were staying home, while loved ones gave birth, or died, or were buried alone - the Prime Minister partied.’

 

Adding that: ‘It is right that we are furious. It is fair that we feel abandoned. And yes - the Prime Minister should resign’ [3].

There are, they say, serious questions to be asked in relation to how a party that was illegal under legislation to stop the spread of coronavirus could have taken place in one of the most heavily guarded locations in the country. They also question why the Metropolitan Police have been unwilling to fully investigate this and other parties.

 

Green Party peer Jenny Jones has written to the Independent Office of Police Complaints and Scotland Yard requesting that a full investigation take place into rule breaking parties at Downing Street, to date the Met police have refused to instigate one.

 

The Spokesperson for North Staffs Green Party said, “to have any meaning at all rules must apply to everyone, if the prime minister and his staff have broken those rules they should be investigated and if found to have done wrong face the consequences”.

 

The Green Party has launched a petition through Action Network calling for a full and independent investigation to take place, it can be accessed at:

https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/police-must-deliver-a-full-fair-and-independent-investigation-into-partygate?link_id=10&can_id=8bc5e413fe5b14a23ca14eb06da17776&source=email-green-party-morning-briefing-monday-17th-jan&email_referrer=email_1412887&email_subject=important-police-bill-update-green-party-morning-briefing-tuesday-17th-jan

 

 

[1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60028895

[2] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60039868

[3] https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/police-must-deliver-a-full-fair-and-independent-investigation-into-partygate?link_id=10&can_id=8bc5e413fe5b14a23ca14eb06da17776&source=email-green-party-morning-briefing-monday-17th-jan&email_referrer=email_1412887&email_subject=important-police-bill-update-green-party-morning-briefing-tuesday-17th-jan

Monday 17 January 2022

The PCSC Bill and Government Plans to Reform the Electoral System are a Pincer Movement Against Our Liberties.

 


Last weekend activists from North Staffs Green Party joined local trades unionists, environmentalists, and anti-racism campaigners to protest against the proposed Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts (PCSC) Bill in Hanley [1].

 

This was part of a week of protests across the country which saw people take to the streets of London, Manchester, Cardiff, Liverpool, and other cities.

 

Speaking to the Guardian one protester at the event held in Parliament Square, Terry Matthews said: “I think we’re facing a really vitriolic attack on our rights to protest and our freedoms to show our dissatisfaction with the status of the government and the country. And it’s a really dangerous step to try to take [2]”.

 

Also speaking to the Guardian on Friday Green Party peer Jenny Jones described the measures against peaceful protest contained in the bill as: “Belarus style laws” and said we have now reached “crunch time for opposition to this increasingly authoritarian government” [3].

 

In an article written for Medium Baroness Jones welcomes the support Labour members of the Lords have give to opposing the bill and eighteen pages of amendments introduced without proper scrutiny but expresses regret this only extends to those covering the right to protest [4].

 

Speaking at the Protest event in Hanley a representative of North Staffs Green Party described the bill as an “assault on the greatest of freedoms; the right to protest” and warned that if passed it would be used to curtail the activities of protesters who spoke our on issues including the environment, workers rights and the way women are treated by some members of the police.

 

Groups taking part in the protest expressed their determination to continue opposing the bill and against the policies of the Johnson government.

 

Speaking to the Sentinel Kevin Deegan, leader of the North Staffs branch of Disabled People Against Cuts said: "If they think it will stop disabled people campaigning, they need to think again. I'm fighting for my life and the lives of other people”.

 

Also speaking to the Sentinel Ollie Johnson of the Stoke Kill The Bill Alliance said Boris Johnson had “succeeded in making an entire country hate him while he's been presiding over the worst government we've ever had”, adding "We've had enough of his lies today. We need MP's and workplace unions to step up together and get Boris Johnson out."

 

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is not the only piece of dangerous and illiberal legislation currently passing through parliament. This could see voters who cannot produce ID documents being turned away from polling stations, it also contains provisions to give ministers a level of control over the Electoral Commission that could threaten its independence.

 

In a report by the cross-party Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs committee chair, Conservative MP William Wragg wrote that the provisions contained in the bill “lack a sufficient evidence base, timely consultation, and transparency, all of which should be addressed before it makes any further progress” [5].

 

Jon Norcross of the Electoral Reform Society has warned that as with the PCSC Bill the government are attempting to ‘sneak’ further damaging provisions in as amendments. These include using the flawed ‘first past the post’ system to elect Police and Crime Commissioners.

 

In an article published on the Electoral Reform Society website he writes that there has been ‘little in the way of meaningful consultation on many of the most dangerous provisions in this bill, last-minute amendments also mean key bits of this legislation have yet to receive any proper scrutiny within parliament. This is no way to make effective legislation’.

 

Going on to say: ‘It’s clear now that the government’s Elections Bill proposals are less about improving our democracy than they are an attack on voters’ ability to cast their ballot and have their voice count’ [6].

 

The Electoral Reform Society have launched a petition calling for the government to rethink the Elections Bill accessible at

https://action.electoral-reform.org.uk/page/35710/petition/1?ea.tracking.id=yi2xbabf&_ga=2.160248509.1058849975.1642418140-2050447901.1630516513

 

A spokesperson for North Staffs Green Party said: ‘The PCSC Bill and the Elections Bill represent a pincer movement against our civil liberties by a government that is becoming increasingly and worryingly authoritarian’, adding that ‘we will be working closely with Kill the Bill and other campaign groups to defend the freedoms that are vital to a democratic society’.

 

 

[1]https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/kill-bill-protest-staged-outside-6497985

[2]https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jan/15/protesters-rally-across-uk-against-police-and-bill

[3]https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jan/14/labour-peers-to-oppose-amendments-to-police-and-bill?link_id=0&can_id=8bc5e413fe5b14a23ca14eb06da17776&source=email-green-party-morning-briefing-wed-12th-jan-4&email_referrer=email_1411992&email_subject=green-party-morning-briefing-monday-17th-jan

[4]https://green-party.medium.com/fighting-our-government-to-protect-our-right-to-protest-f845f54a7aaf

[5]https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/even-senior-mps-agree-the-government-needs-to-pause-and-rethink-the-elections-bill/

[6]https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/the-government-should-stop-and-re-think-elections-bill-as-it-returns-to-the-commons/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ers-email&utm_campaign=blog-roundup&utm_content=Blog+Round+Up+15+Jan+B

 

 

 

 

 

Thursday 13 January 2022

Act Now to Let the Council Know You Oppose Building on Green Sites.

 

North Staffs Green Party are urging people living in Newcastle-under-Lyme to respond to a council consultation on the future of green sites in the borough while there is still time.

 

On 13th January 2021 the borough council cabinet resolved to produce a new Local Plan for the local authority area, consultation on the first stage of this, the strategic options document began in November [1].

 

The strategic options document sets out plans for housebuilding in the borough up to 2040 and has seen green spaces come under threat of development, including the former Keele Golf Course and land in Chesterton and Bradwell.

 

A spokesperson for North Staffs Green Party said: ‘the council is engaged in a land grab of green sites across the borough, and we need to make it clear to them that local people will not accept this, responding to the consultation is one way in which we can do so.’

 

Newcastle resident Adri Hartveld said that all six of the options put forward by the council would ‘lead to further climate breakdown and a deterioration of the environment in the borough of Newcastle-under-Lyme. This would include an increase in air pollution, a loss of green spaces and a further dilapidation of buildings, especially in the town centres’.

 

In a detailed response to the consultation, he calls for brownfield sites to be prioritized for development and for more affordable housing to be built. He also calls for the council to make it easier for people to walk and cycle as part of making the plan more environmentally friendly.

 

Concerns have also been expressed about the impact of losing green spaces will have on the wellbeing of people living in and around Newcastle. One resident who spoke to North Staffs Green party and asked not to be named said there needed to be more emphasis in the plan on the link between health and access to green spaces, particularly for young people who needed open spaces ‘within easy distance of home to kick a ball about, play basketball etc’.

 

Adding that the borough council need to take ‘a more holistic approach to planning vis-à-vis health, social interaction, pet walking, communal fruit trees, maybe gardening/flower clubs etc. The plan should be more joined-up in terms of the interconnectedness of these things and how well-planned space can be used to improve life in general’.

 

North Staffs Green party have questioned the quality of the consultation process, in a letter written to council leader Simon Tagg, they suggested it fell short of requirements set out under the Nolan rules in relation to openness, accountability and the likelihood of insufficient data being collected to allow the council to make an objective decision.

 

Questions have also been asked about the accessibility of the consultation for people who are not able to respond online. In response the borough council said the consultation process was being run in line with their Statement of Community Involvement published in September 2021 and provided a list of events at which residents could speak to the planning team in person [2].

 

However, residents have spoken to the party about these events not being advertised properly and their concerns not being taken seriously when they do attend.

 

Despite these problems North Staffs Green Party are encouraging anyone living in Newcastle-under-Lyme and the surrounding area to respond to the consultation before it closes later this month. Their spokesperson said ‘while the process for doing so is far from ideal, and we will continue to highlight its many flaws, we urge people to use this opportunity to tell the council in no uncertain terms that they do not want to see green spaces that are valued by their community lost to poorly thought through development plans’.

 

The consultation on the options put forward for the Local Plan runs until 24th January, details about the options and how to respond can be accessed at [3].

 

 

[1]https://www.newcastle-staffs.gov.uk/downloads/file/428/local-development-scheme-2021-2024

[2] Newcastle-Under-Lyme Borough Council and Stoke-on-Trent City Council (newcastle-staffs.gov.uk)

[3] https://consult.newcastle-staffs.gov.uk/kse

Tuesday 11 January 2022

Stoke Green Activists Stand Up for the Right to Protest.

 


This weekend activists from North Staffs Green party will join trades unionists and civil liberties campaigners in exercising a right the government wants to remove; that to engage in public protest.

 

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill introduced by the government has, rightly, been the focus of concern for the threat is poses to basic civil liberties. A range of amendments introduced to the bill without the opportunity for scrutiny, described by Green Party peer Jenny Jones as ‘draconian,’ will make its provisions even more dangerously illiberal.

 

A spokesperson for North Staffs Green Party said, ‘the right to protest is fundamental to democracy, it is through protest that we make those in power of our unwillingness to accept injustice.’

 

Responding to the first iteration of the bill in March last year Liberty said it represented the ‘dismantling of hard-won and deeply cherished rights to freely assemble and express dissent’ [4].

 

These include criminalizing any protest deemed to be interfering with infrastructure such as roads, expand police ‘stop and search’ powers to allow them to search any vehicle or person suspected of carrying material that could be used in an illegal protest, and to stop and search without suspicion any individual in an area where they believe a protest my occur.

 

This is directly aimed at criminalizing the activities of legitimate protesters who used direct action to highlight issues such as climate change and animal rights. The bill, if passed, would give the police the power to stop any demonstration on the orders of the government.

 

As a briefing issued by the Green Party states ‘These are dictatorial powers that would remove some of our most basic democratic rights and freedoms. They would enable the government, or future governments, to turn the UK into a police state’ [1].

 

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is due to be debated in the House of Lords on 10th, 12th, and 17th January. Green and Liberal Democrat peers have consistently opposed the bill and the latest slate of amendments. Labour and Independent peers have failed, to date, to offer consistent opposition the Greens are calling for them to join their colleagues in voting down the amendments.

 

A national protest will be held in Parliament Square at 10:00 am on Wednesday 12th January, there will also be smaller protests staged around the country over the following days [2]. There is also a petition on 38Degrees, which can be signed by going to [3].

 

A local protest event will take place at Hanley Bus Station on Saturday 15th January beginning at midday, details can be accessed on Facebook at:

https://www.facebook.com/events/616173966276071

 

A spokesperson for North Staffs Green Party said, ‘we are proud to be taking to the streets in solidarity with trades unionists and other campaigners who are coming together to defend our right to speak truth to power; particularly when those who hold it do not want to listen.’

 

 

[1]https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qav_CQAci24MrJ35rHSN-TYyqbE7FXY8/view?link_id=2&can_id=8bc5e413fe5b14a23ca14eb06da17776&source=email-small-business-saturday-resources-2&email_referrer=email_1399981&email_subject=10-days-to-save-the-right-to-protest

[2]https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/protest-for-the-right-to-protest-tickets-236760967427

[3]https://speakout.38degrees.org.uk/campaigns/stop-the-attacks-on-our-democratic-rights-policing-bill

[4]https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Libertys-Briefing-on-the-Police-Crime-Sentencing-and-Courts-Bill-HoC-2nd-reading-March-2021-1.pdf

 

Friday 7 January 2022

Children’s Centre Closures Represent an Ongoing Salami Slicing of Services.

 

Green Party activists in Stoke-on-Trent have expressed their concern about plans put froward by the council to close three children’s centres as part of a proposed £7.1million in budget cuts.

 

The cuts are part of a package of savings that will see the three children’s centres closed, along with the loss of twenty-two jobs and cuts to non-statutory social care services including closing the city’s Meals on Wheels service [1].

 

A spokesperson for North Staffs Green Party said “the proposed closure of three children’s centres is deeply concerning. It will have serious consequences for families that are struggling and, together with the other cuts represents the ongoing salami slicing of services used by the most vulnerable people in our city.”

 

The three children’s centres under threat of closure are in Blurton, The Crescent Meir, and Norton. Two other centres, Burslem and The Treetops would be transferred to be run by third party organizations by April of next year, it is not clear whether they would retain their legal designation as children’s centres.

 

The city’s five other current centres would be retained and developed as ‘family hubs,’ at which support, and outreach services would be delivered in a way the council claim will ‘allow us to focus our resources on those services that make the most difference to families by reducing spend on the administration, maintenance and management of our buildings. The proposal also aims to build on the changing ways that people use our services’ [2].

 

Family hubs are part of a £500million government initiative to offer ‘one stop’ advice and support to families. As part of the plan £82milliion will be shared by 75 local authorities to fund the new ‘family hubs’.

 

Although welcoming the additional funding being made available leading children’s charities have criticised the government for not going far enough. Neil Leitch of the Early Year Alliance told the BBC in October that not enough was being done to address problems in the early years sector, particularly the challenges faced by nurseries.

 

Also speaking to the BBC Alison Morton of the Institute of Health Visiting said children’s services had had a ‘really challenging time’ during the pandemic and that the government needed ‘to go an awful lot further’ if it was serious about building back better for children and families [3].

 

The council say services will not be reduced and will be delivered using alternative venues including schools and community centres and that the changes will allow it to ‘spend the limited money that is available to us on delivering better services and less money on maintaining buildings’.

 

Referring to claims services will be unaffected by the changes the North Staffs Green Party spokesperson said, “any change to how and where services are delivered can be problematic for families, particularly in a city with a public transport system that often falls far below an acceptable standard of service, the council do not appear to have fully recognised this awkward fact of many people’s daily lives”.

 

Conservative council leader Abi Brown said the council had to reduce spending on non-statutory services to ‘focus’ funding on the areas where it was needed most and drew attention to the £154.4 million set to be spent on adults and children’s social services next year.

 

This will be partially achieved through extra funding from central government, there will also, if the proposals go through, be a 2.99% rise in Council Tax bills for residents.

 

Speaking to The Sentinel this week Councillor Brown said the council had ‘worked really hard’ to retain children’s centres and recognised that the centres proposed for closure were valued by the communities they serve, saying "I know this will be a disappointment to some people out there. We've worked really hard to make sure the reduction is kept to a minimum. The government has been clear that family hubs are the way forward, and we are keen to capitalise on that."

 

The North Staffs Green Party spokesperson said “disappointment at seeing their children’s centre closed is putting it mildly, too mildly. Many families will despair at seeing yet more cuts to services”, adding “we are committed to being by their side in campaigning to protect these and other vital services from being axed”.

 

Stoke-on-Trent City Council is holding a public consultation on the proposed changes to Children’s Centres, details about the proposals and how to respond can be accessed at: https://www.stoke.gov.uk/childrencentresconsultation

 

[1]https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/childrens-centres-close-tax-go-6439025

[2] Stoke-on-Trent City Council, Summary of Proposed Changes to Children’s Centres in Stoke-on-Trent, accessed 7/1/2022

[3] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59018031